Interesting by looking at the speed of the amendment move by the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH). To be fair, they should include LAM/PAM as part of the crucial stakeholders before tabling the OSHA amendment.
By the way, creating another rule of law to regulate the architectural practice will be redundant and thus creating more pressure to the practice as the Architects Act 1967 is more than suffice to safeguard the interest of the public. The same goes to engineers under Engineers Act 1967.
In the aspect concerning professional demeanor, it would be unrealistic to justify such move that undermine the professionals' credibility in construction industries.
A knee-jerk reaction is not a professional way to harmonise the construction issues and well-being . Listen to the voice of professionals.
By Muhammad Azmir
Comments
Post a Comment